mike wrote:That's reasonable just don't get caught up in demanding exact distances
until you've been involved in trying to get an accurate course with all
the problems that come with trying to produce an accurate and safe course
There are a lot of variables that most people are not aware of
triserf wrote:For the record, my Garmin 305 said it was 1.7 miles, a little short. Bike was 14.58.
Hey Brad, I was one of the 21% and I KNOW for a fact that I can't avg that pace in those conditions.
Brad S wrote:mike wrote:Oh well, if it was dead on, great. If not, the adjustment on interval paces are going to make track sessions BRUTAL.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests